[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
--- Begin Message ---
- From: pinard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (
- Date: 12 Feb 2002 14:27:22 -0500
> email@example.com (François Pinard) writes:
> > [Florian Weimer]
> >> Katsumi Yamaoka <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> >> > Why don't we use emacs-w3m for converting text/html parts on Gnus?
> >> Using w3m might have some nasty security implications (much like the
> >> embedded Internet Explorer in Microsoft Outlook).
> > Please elaborate. :-)
> I don't trust w3m, it has a remarkable security record.
Your remark does not bring new information. By "please elaborate", I was
inviting my correspondent to provide some facts on which an opinion could
be based, that is, more than the re-statement of an intuition or emotion...
Do you have some URL, pointer, flaw description, that could be verified?
`w3m' seems really speedy, and does reasonable work for tables, and at
least a little something for frames, so I would not like giving it up.
Let's see the real nature of the danger, and if there is anything serious,
if `w3m' could be salvaged -- it is most probably worth some effort! :-)
François Pinard http://www.iro.umontreal.ca/~pinard
--- End Message ---