[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Call for info writers
Masatake YAMATO <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> I'd like to write M-x <function> explicitly for info-like-map user.
Hm. I thought we were going to provide a full map in the
documentation, so that Info-map users can find what keys do what? This
information belongs there.
> We have written about key bindings based on only lynx-like-map. I
> think if writing also M-x <function>, info-like-map user can do M-x
> where-is easily to find where the function is bound-to in
That's true, however we agreed on the fact that we'd use the lynx-like
map for all key bindings in the documentation and giving the function
name doesn't really add information in that case. As someone
previously observed, Info-map users are probably skilled enough to use
something like `C-h m' to find by themselves the right bindings; or
they can read the Info-map related nodes in the documentation.
> This is just another ugly notation?
It's just useless, I think. Yamaoka-san, what do you think?
Romain FRANCOISE <email@example.com> | I'm flooded out with energy,
it's a miracle -- http://orebokech.com/ | energy and deceit.