[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Call for info writers
> Masatake YAMATO <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> > I've written both key binds(DEL and >) and command
> > names(w3m-scroll-down-or-previous-url, w3m-scroll-left). In such case,
> > should I write M-x as a prefix for the command names or not?
> If the command is bound to a key, there is no need to give the M-x
> <function> in the key bindings, this is useful only if there are no key
> bindings for the command.
I'd like to write M-x <function> explicitly for info-like-map user.
We have written about key bindings based on only lynx-like-map. I
think if writing also M-x <function>, info-like-map user can do M-x
where-is easily to find where the function is bound-to in
This is just another ugly notation?