[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: bogus change(s) in cl-macs.el

>> Well, actually we can't see it here because you haven't used print-gensym
>> to distinguish symbols with the same name.  But indeed:

>> (labels ((foo nil 1) (bar nil 2)) (cons (foo) (bar)))

>> returns (1 . 1).  This is because cl's macro environment uses symbol names
>> rather than symbols for symbol-macros, so if two symbols have the same name
>> (i.e. `eq', not just `equal') and they both are symbol-macros, then
>> CL screws up.  I'm working on a patch for that.

> Excuse me for being so rude, but didn't you forget to commit the fix?

Sorry, I haven't had time to do it yet,