[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: bogus change(s) in cl-macs.el
>> Well, actually we can't see it here because you haven't used print-gensym
>> to distinguish symbols with the same name. But indeed:
>> (labels ((foo nil 1) (bar nil 2)) (cons (foo) (bar)))
>> returns (1 . 1). This is because cl's macro environment uses symbol names
>> rather than symbols for symbol-macros, so if two symbols have the same name
>> (i.e. `eq', not just `equal') and they both are symbol-macros, then
>> CL screws up. I'm working on a patch for that.
> Excuse me for being so rude, but didn't you forget to commit the fix?
Sorry, I haven't had time to do it yet,