Making emacs-w3m part of Emacs

[Romain Francoise <romain@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Apologies if this has been discussed before, I couldn't find anything
relevant in the list archives (but then they're mostly in Japanese).

I think emacs-w3m should become part of Emacs.  It's fast, it's usable,
it's pretty, it's convenient; in every aspect it is what Emacs/W3 should
have been.  Now it even has a very respectable Info manual.

Apart from a manual, the main requirement for the inclusion of a new
package in Emacs is copyright assignments for every author of the
software, and collecting those can be a tedious and long process; I can
only encourage you to start it now if emacs-w3m is to enter Emacs even
in the not-so-immediate future.

What do you think?

-- 
Romain Francoise <romain@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> | The sea! the sea! the open
it's a miracle -- http://orebokech.com/ | sea! The blue, the fresh, the
                                        | ever free! --Bryan W. Procter