Re: Making emacs-w3m part of Emacs

[Kin Cho <kcho@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 24 May'06 21:45, Romain wrote:

> Apologies if this has been discussed before, I couldn't find anything
> relevant in the list archives (but then they're mostly in Japanese).
> 
> I think emacs-w3m should become part of Emacs.  It's fast, it's usable,
> it's pretty, it's convenient; in every aspect it is what Emacs/W3 should
> have been.  Now it even has a very respectable Info manual.

I totally agree.  Another issue is that w3m needs to be included as well.

Thanks,

-kin

> Apart from a manual, the main requirement for the inclusion of a new
> package in Emacs is copyright assignments for every author of the
> software, and collecting those can be a tedious and long process; I can
> only encourage you to start it now if emacs-w3m is to enter Emacs even
> in the not-so-immediate future.
> 
> What do you think?
> 
> -- 
> Romain Francoise <romain@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> | The sea! the sea! the open
> it's a miracle -- http://orebokech.com/ | sea! The blue, the fresh, the
>                                         | ever free! --Bryan W. Procter