[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Bug: TAB and S-TAB are not opposites
- From: Samuel Wales <samologist@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2010 17:14:10 -0700
- X-ml-name: emacs-w3m
- X-mail-count: 11185
- References: <20524da71003100943k200517d3xa3da31003c382d0c@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <b4mhbon21im.fsf@xxxxxxx>
<S-tab> runs the command advertised-widget-backward .
Maybe not w3m's fault?
On 2010-03-10, Katsumi Yamaoka <yamaoka@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>> In [emacs-w3m : No.11183] Samuel Wales wrote:
>> TAB and shift-TAB are not opposites. On Google, if you are
>> on the Search button, there is a new command bound to the
>> latter.
>
> What is that new command? (C-h c <S-tab>)
> By default <tab> and <S-tab> are bound to `w3m-next-anchor' and
> `w3m-previous-anchor' respectively, so I don't find why they are
> not opposites.
>
>
--
Q: How many CDC "scientists" does it take to change a lightbulb?
A: "You only think it's dark." [CDC has denied a deadly disease for 25 years]
==========
Retrovirus: http://www.wpinstitute.org/xmrv/index.html