Re: sb-atom and sb-rss fetching already deleted articles

[Katsumi Yamaoka <yamaoka@xxxxxxx>]

>>>>> In [emacs-w3m : No.11162] David Engster wrote:
> I've implemented the approach I quoted above and attached a patch
> against current CVS.  The advantage of this approach is that it works
> more generally, without the need for an extra parameter.

Oh, I understood what you meant at last.  It picks articles of
which the date is newer than the ones having already been fetched,
and saves articles of which the date cannot be identified.  That's
an excellent idea!

> So far it has worked for me, but I obviously couldn't test some of
> the special cases for 'hankaku' which are implemented there.

Looks no problem, except for `float-time'.  It is not available in
XEmacs, so we will have to provide it as `w3m-float-time', like Gnus
does.

> Maybe you could take a look at the patch and see if it works for you.  I
> could implement the same for sb-atom.el if you should decide to apply
> it.

Please go ahead.

> --- sb-rss-blogs.el	25 Feb 2010 02:11:10 -0000	1.3
> +++ sb-rss-blogs.el	25 Feb 2010 20:53:09 -0000
> @@ -80,7 +80,7 @@
>  						  shimbun-rss-blogs)
>  						 &optional range)
>    (let ((group (shimbun-current-group-internal shimbun))
> -	(headers (shimbun-rss-get-headers shimbun range t nil t))
> +	(headers (shimbun-rss-get-headers shimbun range t))

I think it's better to be:
        (headers (luna-call-next-method))

Regards,