[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: right clicking on URL in emacs-w3m vs. gnus
- From: Ted Zlatanov <tzz@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2010 19:01:49 -0500
- X-ml-name: emacs-w3m
- X-mail-count: 11217
- References: <87sk6thfcc.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxx> <87sk6qf3bu.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <b4mwrw149t1.fsf@xxxxxxx> <87iq7kc2bd.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <b4mochcb6kb.fsf@xxxxxxx>
On Thu, 22 Apr 2010 10:48:52 +0900 Katsumi Yamaoka <yamaoka@xxxxxxx> wrote:
KY> Hm, if what OP wishes is the *w3m* menu, though I'm still hard to
KY> imagine what menu items should be there, I don't want it. I only
KY> tried a way to implement the right-click menu in an article of
KY> *plain text* , not html.
OK. Let's go with your implementation then, I see what I
>> You could make a "yamaoka-dev" branch and push it with any proposed
>> changes instead of a patch (the commit e-mail will still go out and we
>> can see your changes in the e-mail). Then we can try the feature
>> (collaboratively making changes to yamaoka-dev in the process) and merge
>> it into the master branch when it's ready and you can then delete
>> yamaoka-dev. I don't know if that's the right model for us so feel free
>> to propose something else if you think it's better.
KY> Ok. I agree it's more efficient to make a branch rather than to
KY> post a big patch to everyone.
We should do this for changes that may break the master or are somehow
debated. This change is pretty minor and benign so don't bother if you
don't want to.