[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] w3m-lnum add highlight
- From: Katsumi Yamaoka <yamaoka@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 08 Jul 2010 16:54:01 +0900
- X-ml-name: emacs-w3m
- X-mail-count: 11260
- References: <87630wfds0.fsf@xxxxxxxxx> <b4m1vbij0vi.fsf@xxxxxxx> <87k4p9o90q.fsf@xxxxxxxxx> <b4mpqz1s2fg.fsf@xxxxxxx> <87k4p88gbq.fsf@xxxxxxxxx> <b4meifggiel.fsf@xxxxxxx> <878w5nv8fn.fsf@xxxxxxxxx>
In [emacs-w3m : No.11258] Andrey Kotlarski wrote:
> Katsumi Yamaoka <yamaoka@xxxxxxx> writes:
>> Hm, at least I have no reason to object to the use of `f' and `F'.
>> However, I hesitate to use such precious single keystrokes. Has
>> anyone reserved those keys for the future use? Alternatively,
>> how about `C-c l' and `C-c C-l'?
> I've no objections, it's all Emacs, it's all good, rebinding is a
> breeze. For me it's that useful and as a bonus would be consistent for
> Conkeror users. Also as a sort of suggestion, I've
> `w3m-linknum-toggle-image' on `C-c t' which also seems available in both
> keymaps (don't know if this is that useful despite my frequent use).
But Štěpán Němec wrote in http://article.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.w3m/8618 :
(Thanks Štěpán for pointing it out.)
> C-c l is out of the question. By an Emacs convention, C-c <alphabetic>
> are reserved for users.
So, we have no choice but to respect the rule. Again, does anyone
object to the use of `f' and `F'? I'll make those keys the default
bindings if no one brings another idea.
In Japanese: だれも代案を出さなければ、`f' と `F' を使っちゃうぞ。
>> And more, could you provide the ChangeLog entries by yourself?
> 2010-07-07 Andrey Kotlarski <m00naticus@xxxxxxxxx>
Thanks. I've installed it and your new patch.
P.S. Maybe next week I'll set about working on making w3m-lnum.el
work with XEmacs.