[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] w3m-lnum add highlight
- From: =?utf-8?b?xaB0xJtww6FuIE7Em21lYw==?= <stepnem@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 07 Jul 2010 15:18:55 +0200
- X-ml-name: emacs-w3m
- X-mail-count: 11259
- References: <87630wfds0.fsf@xxxxxxxxx> <b4m1vbij0vi.fsf@xxxxxxx> <87k4p9o90q.fsf@xxxxxxxxx> <b4mpqz1s2fg.fsf@xxxxxxx> <87k4p88gbq.fsf@xxxxxxxxx> <b4meifggiel.fsf@xxxxxxx>
Katsumi Yamaoka <yamaoka@xxxxxxx> writes:
>> We are spoiled with so many ways of navigating within Emacs. I have
>> `w3m-linknum-follow' bound to "f", it's free within both lynx and info
>> keymaps and guess what, it's same in Conkeror. Which makes me think of
>> "F" for `w3m-go-to-linknum'.
>
> Hm, at least I have no reason to object to the use of `f' and `F'.
> However, I hesitate to use such precious single keystrokes. Has
> anyone reserved those keys for the future use? Alternatively,
> how about `C-c l' and `C-c C-l'? In short in Japanese:
>
> `f' キーを `w3m-linknum-follow' に、`F' キーを `w3m-go-to-linknum'
> に、それぞれ割り当てることについてどう思いますか?
> 代わりに `C-c l' と `C-c C-l' では?
C-c l is out of the question. By an Emacs convention, C-c <alphabetic>
are reserved for users.
Štěpán