[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Build errors - bad fd number
On 2019-02-25 06:58, Colin Baxter wrote:
> P.S. If users are using a reasonably up-to-date Debian then they will most
> probably have to install the latest Autoconf themselves. Debian tend to
> ship 'old' packages; for example, Debian 3.16.59-1 comes with Autoconf
> 2.13. Emacs-w3m is the only source I've compiled where I have needed to
> update autoconf. I have been able to use autoconf 2.13 on Emacs-27.0.50,
> org-mode, auctex - to name but three.
Excellent point. You're right. We should be able to build on debian
out-of-the-box. Wait a minute. Are you sure? My memory is that debian
has never including autoconf by default, and that one had always needed
to install 'build-essential'. What system exactly are you using?
On my debian system, 'apt policy autoconf' shows only different
sub-versions of 2.69. Querying the debian website's package database
also shows that even oldstable was using 2.69. It's only further down on
that page that I come across older versions, but they are explicitly
packaged with different and unique names, such as 'autoconf2.13'.
Let us know what you're dealing with, please.
CA45 09B5 5351 7C11 A9D1 7286 0036 9E45 1595 8BC0