[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: w3m-session and emacs23
- From: Francis Moreau <francis.moro@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 09:39:40 +0100
- X-ml-name: emacs-w3m
- X-mail-count: 10737
- References: <38b2ab8a0902190342kf5d14d7jd0d3eef805533b02@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <b4mab8iav4s.fsf_-_@xxxxxxx> <38b2ab8a0902200240u115f64a8sef200cda9151b6e4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <b4m1vtt4at5.fsf@xxxxxxx> <38b2ab8a0902200451o101a8caao4f050e47cb8743fe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <b4mskm6djc0.fsf@xxxxxxx> <87fxi52zed.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <b4mljrwwss0.fsf@xxxxxxx> <m2zlgba6s4.fsf@xxxxxxxxx> <b4mab8bwhyb.fsf@xxxxxxx>
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 12:09 AM, Katsumi Yamaoka <yamaoka@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> We'd like to reserve such a single key stroke for the future
> expansion. If the single `f' key is mapped to a command, it
> blocks introducing two or more key strokes like `f a', `f a a',
> etc. In other words, commands that keys beginning with `f' are
> more suitable might appear in the future. But you can use `f'
> for `w3m-go-to-linknum' by yourself, of course. To do that, add
> the following line to your ~/.emacs-w3m.el file:
>
I see, and as you said I'm free to remap it.
> (define-key w3m-mode-map "f" 'w3m-go-to-linknum)
>
>> Are you going to release a new version of emacs-w3m which has this new
>> mapping ?
>
>> The releases on the web sites are quite old.
>
> Yes, it's a trouble to me, too. :< The chief, TSUCHIYA Masatoshi,
> said that there are some incomplete features that stop the release.
> They are listed in:
>
> http://cvs.namazu.org/emacs-w3m/BUGS.ja?view=auto
> (All are written in Japanese, sorry.)
ah, not very useful for me, sorry.
> Though I don't think so very much. I think releasing, even if
> there are some bugs, would be better rather than remaining the
> very old one.
I think so.
Releasing old stuff only and you probably obsolete feedbacks (like mine).
And it also looks like the project is stalled somehow.
Maybe just releasing some snapshot releases makes clear that the software
is under development (not stable).
thanks
--
Francis