Re: w3m-clear-display-while-reading vs C-c C-k stop

[Boruch Baum <boruch_baum@xxxxxxx>]

On 2017-03-19 16:33, Kevin Ryde wrote:
> I think I'd probably prefer automatically go B, but as long as not in
> the limbo of saying "Reading ..." but not reading then fine.  Maybe
> others have an opinion.

If I'm correctly understanding the thread, I would want the the
process to abort, and to display an abort message rather than
continuing to hog resources. My concern is because when I encounter
this situation, it's when I've sent the emacs w3m server a few DOZEN
simultaneous requests. The server blithely seems to attempt to perform
all simultaneously instead of enforcing some kind of limit. Hmm, maybe
that would be a method to mitigiate the situation happening in the
first place? Impose a configurable limit on simultaneous page-load
requests?


OT: If this is a gag, share the URL please.
> The International Journal of Haruspicy is the world's premier journal of
> rigorous peer-reviewed evidence-based haruspicy.  All authors of work
> with randomized control achieving significance p<0.05 are encouraged to
> submit.

--
hkp://keys.gnupg.net
CA45 09B5 5351 7C11 A9D1  7286 0036 9E45 1595 8BC0