[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: w3m via `package-list-packages'
- From: Andrey Kotlarski <m00naticus@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 05 Jul 2013 23:32:43 +0300
- X-ml-name: emacs-w3m
- X-mail-count: 12079
- References: <87bo6nz062.fsf@xxxxxx> <yg1li5q1gmv.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <87a9m41m2x.fsf@xxxxxx>
The following message is a courtesy copy of an article
that has been posted to gmane.emacs.w3m as well.
[ 3 юли 2013, 04:14 +0300, сряда ] Michael Heerdegen:
> FWIW - no, they aren't. There is no upgrade. I read you had some CVS
> related problems, but couldn't follow because I don't understand
> Japanese.
Woops, nah, I don't have access to the repository.
> Mmh, wait, I see a version 19991231.1800, built from CVS, is available
> at Melpa now. Presumably it is considered older than the last git built
> version by package.el, I'm not offered to update the w3m package. Is
> this really the current version? Anyway, I'll wait and see what
> happens...
Currently Melpa has problem setting right time-stamp for CVS packages,
here's a ticket:
https://github.com/milkypostman/melpa/issues/859
Otherwise, yes, it's actually the latest code no matter of the version.
--
It is easier to change the specification to fit the program than vice
versa.
-- Alan Perlis