[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
>> On Mon, 10 Mar 2003 08:31:47 +0900
>> firstname.lastname@example.org (Katsumi Yamaoka) said as follows:
>The theme of "integration" (or "generalization" which I used) does
>sound beautiful. However, on the contrary, if it complicates a code
>or forces a user inconvenience, I think two or more mechanisms will
>be allowed because it wouldn't be required to run fast. The variable
>`w3m-uri-modify-functions' is one of the solution.
I think that `w3m-uri-modify-functions' and w3m-filter is another
problem. My message mentioned only possibility of integeration of
conversion modules of contents retrieved from servers including
w3m-filter, but does not mention URI-modification functions such as
`w3m-uri-replace' and `w3m-search-quick-search-handler'.
;; I'm sorry for slow reply. My reply against [emacs-w3m:04711] still
;; needs polishing.